The logo of the Melammu Project

The Melammu Project

The Heritage of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East


  The Melammu Project
  
   General description
   Search string
   Browse by topic
   Search keyword
   Submit entry
  
   About
   Open search
   Thematic search
   Digital Library
   Submit item
  
   Ancient texts
   Dictionaries
   Projects
   Varia
   Submit link
  FAQ
  Contact us
  About

  The Newsletter
  To Project Information >

 

The nature of beneficial magic (1)

Printable view
Topics (move over topic to see place in topic list)

05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore


Keywords
magic
Period
No period specified
Channel
Jewish philosophers and scholars


Text
It is a misconception that the Talmud, like the Bible, was opposed to magic. What is being opposed in all systems of magic was witchcraft and black arts, which were considered odious in biblical, talmudic, and Akkadian systems of magic. Witchcraft, however, is only one form of magic, with the bulk of magic being protective and therapeutic, and hence beneficial. The systems of magic have much in common, namely that illness and misfortune was conveyed by demons on sufferers, who may have been liable to demonic attack in some instances by transgressing some taboo or custom. Other agents of magic, such as the evil mouth and evil tongue, are commonly cited in both Akkadian and Jewish magic. The evil eye denotes a fear of envy, and the evil tongue refers to gossip and slander, both of which feature in magic as manifestations of black magic and witchcraft, in which the patient feels himself to be victimised by another person, and against whom an incantation was thought to be effective.


Bibliography

Geller 1999, 29Geller, M. J. “The Babylonian Background to Talmudic Science.” European Association for Jewish Studies Newsletter 6 (1999) 27-31. [PDF]

Amar Annus


URL for this entry: http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/database/gen_html/a0000974.php


Illustrations
No pictures


^
T
O
P